Switzerland was invited to debate issues on account of the Paris agreement. The secular princes regarded upon their lands as non-public possessions that might be divided by settlement amongst their sons and drew little distinction between their non-public and their public revenues. Now we're getting into a time in human historical past where we will recognize that rule by debt, or rule by Private Central Bankers issuing the public currency as a loan at interest, is equally illegitimate. By that...

Switzerland was invited to debate issues on account of the Paris agreement. The secular princes regarded upon their lands as non-public possessions that might be divided by settlement amongst their sons and drew little distinction between their non-public and their public revenues. Now we're getting into a time in human historical past where we will recognize that rule by debt, or rule by Private Central Bankers issuing the public currency as a loan at interest, is equally illegitimate. By that...